Papers
arxiv:2602.02660

MARS: Modular Agent with Reflective Search for Automated AI Research

Published on Feb 2
· Submitted by
taesiri
on Feb 4
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

MARS is a modular AI research automation framework that uses budget-aware planning, modular construction, and reflective memory to achieve state-of-the-art performance in autonomous machine learning research.

AI-generated summary

Automating AI research differs from general software engineering due to computationally expensive evaluation (e.g., model training) and opaque performance attribution. Current LLM-based agents struggle here, often generating monolithic scripts that ignore execution costs and causal factors. We introduce MARS (Modular Agent with Reflective Search), a framework optimized for autonomous AI research. MARS relies on three pillars: (1) Budget-Aware Planning via cost-constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explicitly balance performance with execution expense; (2) Modular Construction, employing a "Design-Decompose-Implement" pipeline to manage complex research repositories; and (3) Comparative Reflective Memory, which addresses credit assignment by analyzing solution differences to distill high-signal insights. MARS achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source frameworks on MLE-Bench under comparable settings, maintaining competitiveness with the global leaderboard's top methods. Furthermore, the system exhibits qualitative "Aha!" moments, where 63% of all utilized lessons originate from cross-branch transfer, demonstrating that the agent effectively generalizes insights across search paths.

Community

Paper submitter

MARS uses budget-aware planning, modular design, and reflective memory to automate AI research, achieving strong performance and cross-branch knowledge transfer.

hello guys, great results, i noticed table 1 shows, mars+ is more likely to win gold than bronze, so it does not degrade gracefully but agents appears to suffer from logic corruption. could this be because of hallucination or memory degradation?

·

Could you provide further clarification on this question? Specifically, since winning a gold medal implies achieving a bronze medal, I am curious how to interpret the statement "Agent is more likely to win gold than bronze". Additionally, could you define what is meant by "logic corruption" in this context?

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2602.02660 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2602.02660 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2602.02660 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.